What a difference a day makes.
Yesterday I was wondering on whether it’s possible to set up a dumb ‘slave’ iPhone to act as a part of the hive mind and pass on location info about our cats. Today Willow has wandered in, sans collar, and that means no tile either. I haven’t lost my cat, but I have lost his collar.
I’ve marked Willow’s Collar as Lost. I’ve wandered round the garden and the street staring at my iPhone at the slowly rotating grey circle. Nothing yet.
Let the games begin …
So almost a year after first placing my order my tiles have finally arrived.
First impressions? Quite similar to others – they’re bigger than I expected, but light too. When attached to the cats’ collars the tiles can look a little oversized although this seems to bother me more than it bothers them.
The tile uses bluetooth and as such its range is nothing amazing. I’ve dabbled with bluetooth location devices and know that the “works up to …” type claims need to be treated with some skepticism. So with realistic expectations I was unsurprised to find that I was lucky if detection would work from one end of the house or garden to the other, especially if there’s a brick wall or tree in the way.
The most intriguing aspect of the tile concept for me is the idea of the hive mind. Anyone else who has the tileapp installed on their iPhone or iPad should (in theory) be picking up my tiles if they’re in range of that person’s IOS device. This begs the rather interesting question, how many tiles are there in Durham? Given that mine have just arrived and I ordered mine pretty early on, I wouldn’t be surprised if the answer is close to zero. Especially as a fundamental part of the design philosophy is that you don’t know if you’re picking up someone else’s tiles and passing the location info on.
I ordered 8 tiles, a decision partly based on cost, and partly because the tileapp can only register 8 tiles to an account. I’m not sure how that works if you want some more tiles. Perhaps you have to set up multiple accounts. Eight tiles is a nice number. That’s one for each cat, keys, wallet and one or two to experiment with.
However the main problem I’m having with my shiny new tiles is connected to a pretty irritating limitation regarding the amount of accounts that can be registered to a particular tile. Bluetooth only allows one IOS device to be connected to a tile (or any other bluetooth peripheral for that matter) at any one time. Tile explain this in an FAQ and there’s some promising sounding developments about sharing devices in the pipeline.
No matter I thought – I have a spare iPhone after upgrading to the iPhone 5S. My old iphone 4S is still working fine so I decided to install the tileapp on that too and join the Hive Mind. It doesn’t seem to be possible to do much in the app without creating an account but no problem. I created another account with no tiles registered (although it keeps bugging me to do this). I think of this as a slave account. As far as I understand it anyone with an iPhone or iPad should if they wished be able to install the app and act as a sort of volunteer conduit of tile locations. I’ve tried this and it doesn’t work. In theory my iPhone 4S should sit quietly at home and covertly collect tile location info and pass it on the the hive mind. But it’s not working.
Logging the iphone into the ‘live’ account sorts things out and the iPhone 4S at home faithfully notes the ‘last seen’ location of the various felines so the handset is working, as is my iPad. Which rather begs the question – if someone else is running the tileapp on their iPhone on their account – will it pick up my tiles and pass the information on? I suspect it may not and I can’t think of a way of testing this apart from what I’ve been doing, which would strongly suggest it doesn’t work. I emailed support via the tile website a few days ago, nothing back yet.
I think they have. I know very little about Grey Squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) but they don’t appear to hang around in the nest/dray very long.
In the timelampse (below) I think that sometime around 1120’ish they simply aren’t there any more. When I have a bit of time I will browse through the individual images and see if I can spot anything interesting.
I’m not sure, but I think they leave home today. (no, perhaps not)
a timelapse sequence of a family of grey squirrels in the owlbox (where else?).
This is a time-lapse sequence of about 10,000 webcam images during the course of 1 day (15th August 2014).
Usually there’s nothing much to see, if indeed, the camera is working at all. But when I noticed there had been 10,000 images taken, I decided to browse the images to see what was going on …
Attempting to share a calendar in Outlook (Exchange 2003) produces error (in a pop-up window):
Calendar sharing is not available with the following entries because of permission settings on your network:
Problem might be due to malformed, duplicate or ambiguous email address being autodetected.
>From blogger Gim McBee on: http://mostlyexchange.blogspot.co.uk/2006/03/solving-e-mail-address-alre ady-exists.html Using the Windows 2003 Active Directory Users and Computers utility, right click on the domain, choose Find. In the Find: dropdown list, choose “Custom Search” and in the In: dropdown list, choose “Entire Directory”. Click the Advanced property page and enter the following LDAP query (in my example, at least): proxyaddresses=smtp:email@example.com Click Find and you should find the object that already has that SMTP address. Thanks Rich!